House GOP Transportation Proposal Leaves Metro Transit Riders Out in the Cold


Twin Cities, MN (March 23, 2015)–Today, a group of organizations focused on the needs of transit riders issued this response to the transportation proposal, HF4, announced by GOP leadership of the House of Representatives. The organizations include ATU Local 1005, ISAIAH,  MPIRG, Neighborhoods Organizing for Change, Sierra Club North Star Chapter, and Transit for Livable Communities.

“Minnesota’s transportation system is aging and out of step with changing needs and demographics. As our population grows older and increasingly diverse, more people depend on a full range of transportation choices. We are encouraged that the GOP leadership of the Minnesota House of Representatives recognizes the critical need for transportation investment. Nevertheless, we are deeply concerned by by the absence of attention to the growing number of people who rely on bus and rail service to meet their daily needs.We are also gravely concerned about the impact of this proposal on other vital areas of the budget, including education, health and human services.”

“Over the past several months, our organizations have been lifting up the voices of people who depend on public transportation. Socorro Lopez, a mother from Brooklyn Center, represents the experience of everyday transit riders, saying: ‘Last winter, I tried to board a bus with my kids but it was too full, so we had to wait a full hour for the next one.’ Similarly, we have heard from workers in St. Cloud who can’t get home from their shift because the bus doesn’t run late into the evening. We have heard from employers about the need for reliable transit to attract and keep workers. We have heard from people all over the state who want to be able to walk or bicycle safely and who see these options as essential to vibrant communities, small and large.”

“Recognition is growing that Minnesota has a problem with racial equity. A lack of transportation choices impact people of color most severely. We need an equitable solution right now that doesn’t turn a blind eye to these facts. We need a solution that unites our communities and invests in a more prosperous future.”

“Public transportation should serve best those who need it most. Right now, it is falling short. Bus ridership is up 14% over the past decade while funding has remained stagnant. Fewer than 1 in 10 jobs in the metro are conveniently accessible by transit while in Greater Minnesota transit systems are chronically underfunded, leaving workers, seniors, and students stranded.”

“Minnesota has a long tradition of substantially funding transportation from dedicated sources, including the constitutionally-dedicated gas tax and tab fees and the dedication of a portion of the metro-area sales tax to transit. We support the principles of the Move MN coalition and call on the legislature to pass a comprehensive, dedicated, sustainable long term funding solution this session to build the transportation system that all Minnesotans deserve.”

# # #

Sierra Club Statement of Support for Governor Dayton’s Waterway Buffer Proposal

Minneapolis, MN – Today Governor Dayton’s initiative to require a 50-foot natural vegetation buffer along all of Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands will be heard in the Minnesota legislature. On behalf of the Sierra Club North Star Chapter, State Director Margaret Levin issued this statement of support:

“The Sierra Club believes that all people deserve a healthy planet with clean water, and we are proud to support Governor Dayton’s riparian buffer proposal (HF 1534 and the Senate companion bill, SF 1537).

“This fair and urgently-needed legislation will improve the quality of Minnesota’s water, filter pollutants from runoff, prevent erosion, and create new habitat for pollinators including monarchs, songbirds and wildlife.

“We urge passage of these important bills, and look forward to continued work with Governor Dayton and legislators to protect and improve Minnesota’s clean water.”

Minneapolis: Reverse cuts to clean energy and racial equity programs

Minneapolis City Council
350 South 5th Street
City Hall, Room 307
Minneapolis, MN 55415

December 9, 2014

Dear City Council Members:

On behalf of the Sierra Club’s more than 3,000 members and supporters in the City of Minneapolis, we are writing to share our deep disappointment about the recent 7-6 vote to cut racial equity programs and the Clean Energy Partnership—all to save homeowners an average of only $2.50 per year.

The funding for the Clean Energy Partnership included in the Mayor’s budget is critical to advance the City’s clean energy and efficiency goals. The Partnership is a unique, first-in-the-nation agreement with Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy that will advance these goals, while promoting equitable policies. The cuts would send a disastrous message that the City is not serious about the agreement, and undermine the dedicated citizen and Council leadership that has made this partnership possible. We urge you to keep it and the City’s climate goals on track by restoring funding for the program.

We are gravely concerned by the deep cuts approved to programs addressing racial equity, which include the One Minneapolis Fund’s grants to organizations based in communities of color working to create a more inclusive city, and the study of racial disparities through the Civil Rights Department.

The North Star Chapter is committed to becoming an intercultural, anti-racist organization that is partnering with communities and organizations to eradicate all forms of oppression. Minneapolis has some of the worst racial disparities in the nation, which must be urgently addressed to advance racial and economic justice. These cuts strike at the heart of that effort and undermine the City’s national leadership on reducing and managing the impact of climate change, and efforts to ensure that all our citizens have an opportunity to experience clean water, clean soil and a safe environment.

We appreciate your previous commitment to advancing climate solutions and racial equity, and urge you to restore funding to racial disparity programming and the Clean Energy Partnership on December 10.  These issues are closely intertwined. We hope they will receive your strongest support.


Mathews Hollinshead
Conservation Chair
Sierra Club North Star Chapter

Margaret Levin
State Director
Sierra Club North Star Chapter

100+ Riders Bike Mpls on Sierra Club’s 19th Annual Bike Tour


Saturday, Sept. 20, 2014

Contact: Joshua Houdek, 612-207-2295, Land Use and Transportation Program Director, Sierra Club North Star Chapter

Over 100 people biked across Minneapolis on Saturday for the Sierra Club’s 19th Annual Bike Tour. Riders got an up-close look at bike and transit developments in the city as they traveled from near the Lake St. BLUE Line LRT station in south Minneapolis, through the U of M Campus, and into Downtown, Northeast and North Minneapolis.

Riders followed bike lanes, trails and protected bikeways for most of the 21-mile Tour, experiencing firsthand how bike and transit connections make it easier to get around.

We know that more and more people across Minneapolis and the Twin Cities metro are leaving their cars in the garage and biking, walking, or taking transit to work,” said Alex Tsatsoulis, volunteer chair of the Sierra Club’s Land Use and Transportation Committee. “On this bike tour we want to show riders how our streets can be made into places where everyone – including drivers – can feel safe, and enjoy using them.”

At rest stops along the way, speakers highlighted specific developments that improve biking and walking and even create investment opportunities.

The Tour stopped at the site of Surly Brewing’s “Destination Brewery” – the location for which was intentionally chosen for its proximity to the U of M Transitway and the nearby GREEN Line LRT station. Colleen Carey, President of The Cornerstone Group, spoke of how access to transit and bike-walk facilities can transform neighborhoods.

We believe that the GREEN Line’s Prospect Park LRT Station has great potential for transformation,” she said. “The new stop is important, but even more important to our decision to invest in this area is a great neighborhood organization with a compelling vision that aligns with ours: to design housing around green space and to create great bicycling and pedestrian connections.”

Other speakers included Ted Tucker, former member of the Planning Commission, and Robin Garwood, aide to Councilmember Cam Gordon, who talked about the brand new Dinkytown Greenway and the Bluff Street Trail, which together create a seamless bike route from campus into downtown.

The Tour also went through Open Streets Lowry, where participants discussed a potential North Minneapolis Greenway, and along Washington Ave. Downtown, where a protected bikeway will be constructed in Spring 2015.


State Department Enables Illegal Enbridge Scheme to Expand Tar Sands

For Immediate Release:
Contact: Gabby Brown,, 202-261-2382

This week, the State Department released documents revealing a scheme by Canadian tar sands giant Enbridge to bypass the Presidential Permit process for expansion of its Alberta Clipper tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has applied to double the capacity of the pipeline, also known as Line 67, to put it on par with the tar sands carrying capacity of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline. The State Department has previously made clear that any such expansion requires approval and comprehensive environmental review, and is currently undertaking that review.

Not content to wait for the legally required federal permitting process and environmental review, Enbridge has devised a scheme to transfer the dirty tar sands crude from Alberta Clipper to another pipeline, Line 3, just north of the border, then re-transfer it back to Alberta Clipper once it’s crossed into the United States. This blatant scheme to move up to twice the amount allotted in Enbridge’s permit seems to assert that the pipeline would only impact the few miles around the border crossing, a clear misinterpretation of both the letter and the spirit of the law.

Shockingly, in a two page letter, a mid-level State Department official indicated Enbridge could move forward with this plan despite the fact that it clearly violates the capacity limit imposed by the permit the State Department issued.

“With no public notice, the State Department has shockingly backtracked on its commitment to require environmental review and approval before more dirty tar sands oil enters the United States through Minnesota,” said Marc Fink, a Minnesota-based attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity.

“The State Department has violated the public’s right to transparency and participation in approval of projects that impact the health and safety of our communities, land, water and climate,” added Kate Jacobson, of MN350.  “Allowing significantly more tar sand oil to flow before a full environmental impact analysis is complete is unacceptable and irresponsible.”

“The State Department doesn’t get to make up the law as it goes. This is particularly troubling in light of allegations of an inappropriately cozy relationship between the State Department and the oil industry surrounding the Keystone XL environmental impact statement,” said Jim Murphy, Senior Counsel for National Wildlife Federation.  “The State Department cannot in effect approve a doubling of the amount of climate-disrupting tar sands being carried into the Great Lakes region without conducting a proper public review and permitting process. That is a clear violation of the law and the State Department must immediately reverse course and put the best interests of America first.”

“When will Canada have enough risky pipelines cutting thru our land and water? When is enough?” asked Jane Kleeb, of Bold Nebraska. “For the promise of jobs and energy independence, landowners and tribes are being sold out so foreign corporations can get tar sands on the export market. Canada is engaged in a scam circumventing federal, state and local laws all in the name of exporting their tar sands while we take on all the risk of spills.”

“Expanding the Alberta Clipper pipeline is entirely inconsistent with the administration’s commitment to taking aggressive action on climate change, and it’s also illegal,” said Sierra Club attorney Doug Hayes. “The President’s promise to decide Keystone XL based on its climate impacts is completely meaningless if the State Department is simultaneously permitting other tar sands pipelines behind closed doors.

“Enbridge can’t show how this project is in the nation’s interest, so instead they are trying to hoodwink its regulators,” said Anthony Swift, attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Blindly approving Enbridge’s tar sands pipeline expansion would make a mockery of our permitting process and undermine our efforts to address climate change.”

“Allowing more tar sands oil into the United States without conducting impact analyses is unconscionable and illegal. A State Department spokesman said just this week that the Department is committed to ‘a rigorous, objective, and transparent review process’ with regards to pipeline approval. That is not possible if they eschew a review process altogether,” said Luísa Abbott Galvão of Friends of the Earth.

Jason Kowalski, Policy Director of, said “When we blocked Keystone XL, the fossil fuel industry learned that they have a much stronger hand to play in back rooms than on the streets. They will break the law and wreck our climate if that’s what it takes for them to make a buck — and we will be ready to stand up to them, from Nebraska, to Minnesota, to the streets of New York City.”

“Apparently John Kerry’s Department of State doesn’t think the President’s Climate Test should apply to an additional 350,000 barrels per day of dirty tar sands oil. They’re trying to approve almost half the volume of the KXL pipeline, but it won’t work. If this stands, this will be a disaster for the climate and for the President’s credibility,” said Stephen Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International.  “It’s terrible timing, as the President prepares to join other world leaders in New York next month.  You can’t approve more tar sands into the U.S. and then turn around and talk about a commitment to combating climate change with a straight face. That’s simply climate denial.”

Secretary Kerry and President Obama have both committed to making meaningful progress on climate, and with the international Climate Summit around the corner, the eyes of the world are watching to see how seriously the United States is taking climate action. Allowing this decision to stand would prioritize Enbridge’s desire to expand development of the dirtiest fuel source on the planet over the interests of the American people, and would undermine any credibility President Obama has to encourage other countries to commit to combat climate change.

In the event that the Obama Administration does not recognize the dire consequences of allowing this decision to go through, groups opposed to tar sands expansion are currently evaluating their legal options to force an injunction on construction.




Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Joel Finkelstein for NPCA | 202.285.0113 | finkelstein@climateadvisers

Alison Flowers for Sierra Club | 303-246-6297 |


Clean Air Groups Applaud EPA Review of Pollution Plan for Minnesota’s Dirtiest Coal-Fired Power Plant

Xcel’s Sherco Coal Plant Damages Air Quality for Midwesterners and our National Parks and Wilderness Areas

MINNEAPOLIS, MN — After years of delay, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) yesterday agreed to revisit the pollution control plan for Xcel Energy’s Sherburne County Generating Station (Sherco). Sherco is Minnesota’s dirtiest coal-fired power plant. The pollution created by the 37-year-old Sherco plant is unhealthy for people and is a major contributor to the haze that obscures views at Voyageurs and Isle Royale National Parks, and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.

As a result of this agreement, EPA will act on a 2009 certification by the National Park Service that Sherco is impairing national park visibility. The agency will propose a plan by February 27th, 2015 and finalize a plan by the end of August 2015. EPA’s obligation is based on the Clean Air Act’s requirement to protect America’s greatest national parks and wilderness areas from air pollution.

EPA’s commitment comes as the result of a lawsuit brought by a group of clean air advocates, including the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA), Sierra Club, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA), Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness, Voyageurs National Park Association and Fresh Energy.

“This is a major step toward clean air in Boundary Waters, Voyageurs and Isle Royale,” said Stephanie Kodish, Director & Counsel for the Clean Air Program at NPCA. “At last, today we can say that EPA is going to act. Now we need to make sure that EPA’s action is as strong and meaningful as the Midwest deserves.”

While EPA has agreed to take some action by the end of next February, the form of that action is uncertain. There are at least three possible scenarios:

  • EPA could require Sherco to be retrofitted with best available pollution controls.
  • EPA could determine that the National Park Service was wrong and that Sherco does not impair the air quality in Voyageurs and Isle Royale National Parks, and require no additional controls. This is similar to the argument Xcel is making, even though both Xcel’s and the state’s own air pollution modeling both show that these controls still mean dirty air and impacted visibility at Voyageurs and Isle Royale for roughly a month each year; and at Boundary Waters almost two months of every year.
  • EPA could agree to a weak haze plan put forward by Minnesota state regulators that does not require best available retrofit controls, even though technology that can remove 90 percent or more of haze-causing emissions is available and has been installed on over 200 similar coal plants nationwide.

“We hope that our families will soon be able to breathe a little easier, especially in our parks,” said Jessica Tritsch, organizer for the Sierra Club in Minnesota. “The health consequences of Xcel Energy’s Sherco power plant are still very present, and we need this utility to step up and clean up the dirty air it’s been creating for years.”

EPA’s agreement to take action on the Park Service’s 2009 certification is set forth in a Consent Decree that was lodged yesterday in federal district court in Minneapolis.  The Consent Decree will not become final until the completion of a public comment period and thereafter review and approval by the Court.


NEWS: Sierra Club Applauds Plan to Curb Carbon Pollution


June 2, 2014


Karen Monahan,, 612-259-2451

Alison Flowers,, 303-246-6297


Sierra Club Applauds Plan to Curb Carbon Pollution

CITY, STATE — Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a proposal for the first-ever national protections from dangerous carbon pollution from existing power plants. Carbon pollution causes climate disruption, costing Minnesota families $969,712,360 in 2011 and 2012 alone.

This new standard, which is part of the President’s Climate Action Plan, will clean up the industries that create the lion’s share of carbon pollution in our country and in Minnesota, where Xcel Energy’s Sherco plant remains the largest carbon and soot polluter in the state. The new protections will also help reduce other life-threatening air pollution including mercury, soot, and smog. In response, the Sierra Club North Star Chapter’s Beyond Coal and Environmental Justice campaigns released this video calling for a strong and just carbon rule.

Michelle Rosier, campaign and organizing manager for the Sierra Club, also issued the following statement:

“Today, we applaud President Obama and the EPA for their move to clean up our air, improve the health of our children, and curb the worst effects of climate disruption. These life-saving protections could not come at a more critical time. Climate disruption has already cost Minnesota families more than $969 million in 2011 and 2012 alone.

“Action on climate disruption not only protects our health and communities, but will also spur innovation and strengthen our economy. Minnesotahas been on a path beyond coal to clean energy for a decade, and our state has demonstrated success in reducing carbon while growing a strong economy. These carbon protections are an opportunity to continue to grow our renewable energy economy.

“We now look forward to working with Governor Dayton and all Minnesotans to create a strong and just state implementation plan to protect all Minnesota families from harmful air pollution. We urge Governor Dayton to be the leader we know he is for clean air and healthy children.”